Editor’s Note:  The war in Ukraine is entering a critical phase, with shifting alliances and escalating battlefield confrontations redefining the global landscape. A high-profile meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and U.S. President Donald Trump highlighted growing fractures in Western support, while Russia deepened its ties with China and North Korea. On the front lines, Russian forces continue their advances, prompting Ukraine to strike deep into enemy logistics and strengthen alliances with South Korea. Meanwhile, analysis from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) underscores the fluidity of the conflict, with both sides adapting their military and diplomatic strategies. As global power dynamics evolve, the key question remains: Will Ukraine secure the sustained backing it needs, or will shifting alliances reshape the course of the war?

For those seeking to grasp the full scope of this evolving landscape, the complete updates from the Institute for the Study of War serve as an invaluable resource.

Background Note: ComplexDiscovery’s staff offers distinctive perspectives on the Russo-Ukrainian war and Middle Eastern conflicts, informed by military experience on the West German, East German, and Czechoslovakian border during the Cold War and in Sinai as part of Camp David Accord compliance activities. This firsthand regional knowledge has been further enhanced by recent staff travels to Eastern European countries, including Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. These visits have provided up-to-date, on-the-ground insights into the current geopolitical climate in regions directly impacted by the ongoing conflict.

Combined with cybersecurity, information governance, and eDiscovery proficiency, this multifaceted experience enables comprehensive analysis of these conflicts, including the critical impact of cyber warfare, disinformation, and digital forensics on modern military engagements. This unique background positions ComplexDiscovery to provide valuable insights for conflict-related investigations and litigation, where understanding the interplay of technology, data, and geopolitical factors is crucial.

Russo-Ukrainian Conflict Update*

The War’s Expanding Front: Russian Advances, Ukraine’s Counterattacks, and Global Alliances in Flux

ComplexDiscovery Staff

In a tense and highly consequential development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on February 28. The meeting, which many hoped would reinforce Western unity, instead highlighted a growing rift between Kyiv and Washington. Zelensky reiterated that Ukraine would not accept a ceasefire agreement without strong security guarantees, citing Russia’s repeated violations of past accords. Trump, however, declined to commit to any future U.S. security guarantees or military deployments, and the meeting ended on a discordant note—Secretary of State Marco Rubio reportedly asked Zelensky to leave, and the White House canceled a planned press conference and the signing of a U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal. These developments underscore the fragile nature of Ukraine’s Western support at a time when the battlefield situation remains precarious.

Even as diplomatic tensions mounted, Russia continued to expand its global alliances, strengthening ties with adversaries of the United States. Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu met with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing, reaffirming bilateral security coordination and cooperation within BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Concurrently, Russia deepened its relationship with North Korea, with Dmitry Medvedev meeting North Korean officials in Moscow and signing an economic and trade cooperation agreement. More alarmingly, intelligence reports indicated that 1,000 to 3,000 additional North Korean troops were deployed to Russia’s Kursk Oblast between January and February, raising concerns about Pyongyang’s increasing military involvement in the war.

In response, Ukraine moved to bolster its own international alliances. Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Serhiy Boyev held talks with a South Korean delegation in Kyiv, discussing defense industrial cooperation and countering North Korean support for Russia. South Korea, alarmed by reports of North Korean troops fighting in Kursk, expressed interest in organizing a joint seminar between Ukrainian and South Korean defense manufacturers. The growing alignment between Russia-North Korea-China on one side and Ukraine-South Korea-Western allies on the other reflects the war’s evolving international dimensions.

On the battlefield, Russian forces made incremental advances across multiple fronts. In Donetsk Oblast, Russian troops gained ground in Pokrovsk, Kurakhove, and Velyka Novosilka, while in Zaporizhia Oblast, they advanced into Pyatykhatky, continuing pressure on Ukrainian defenses. Ukrainian counterattacks slowed Russian movements near Lebedevka and Novooleksandrivka, but the frontline remains fluid. Russia’s objectives remain clear:

  • In Kharkiv Oblast, pushing Ukrainian forces back from the international border and bringing Kharkiv City within artillery range.
  • In Luhansk Oblast, capturing the remainder of Ukrainian-controlled territory and advancing westward into northern Donetsk Oblast.
  • In Donetsk Oblast, fully capturing the region to consolidate Russian proxy control.

Meanwhile, Ukraine carried out a series of strategic strikes against Russian military infrastructure. A Ukrainian attack on an ammunition depot containing thermobaric artillery in Selydove, Donetsk Oblast, resulted in significant secondary explosions. Additional strikes targeted Russian command centers and drone control stations in Kherson and Zaporizhia oblasts, disrupting enemy coordination. In a further escalation, Ukraine struck the Ilsky Oil Refinery in Krasnodar Krai, marking its third attack on the facility this month. These strikes signal Ukraine’s intent to target Russian logistics and energy infrastructure deep behind enemy lines.

The air war also intensified. The Russian military launched over 200 Shahed and decoy drones targeting Ukrainian cities, with the Ukrainian Air Force successfully neutralizing 107 of them while an additional 97 were lost due to electronic warfare interference. Despite Ukrainian air defense efforts, civilian and industrial infrastructure in Kharkiv, Zaporizhia, and Sumy oblasts suffered damage. In response, Russia announced the testing of the ERA-GLONASS system, designed to forcibly land civilian drones instead of using anti-aircraft systems—an indication of its focus on adapting to Ukraine’s expanding drone warfare capabilities.

On the domestic front, Moscow continued efforts to consolidate control over occupied territories and reintegrate Russian veterans into society. President Vladimir Putin tasked Crimea’s occupation head, Sergey Aksyonov, with implementing the “Kadry” project, aimed at preventing the emergence of subversive veteran groups. This reflects the Kremlin’s ongoing concerns about political stability as waves of battle-hardened soldiers return home. Additionally, Russia introduced a bill expanding veteran and combat disability status to servicemen fighting in Kursk Oblast, likely in response to criticism over the government’s failure to compensate soldiers engaged in cross-border operations.

In a parallel move, Putin ratified the Union State security agreement with Belarus, deepening military and political ties between the two nations. This agreement could pave the way for expanded Russian military deployments in Belarus, increasing pressure on Ukraine’s northern front.

Taken together, these developments illustrate a complex and rapidly evolving conflict. Russia is escalating its offensive operations while simultaneously securing stronger international backing from China and North Korea. Ukraine, facing battlefield challenges and potential wavering support from its Western partners, is attempting to strengthen alliances with nations like South Korea and disrupt Russian logistics through strategic strikes. As Russia consolidates its territorial gains and adapts its technological and military strategies, the central question remains: Will Ukraine receive the sustained military and political backing needed to repel Russian advances, or will shifting global alliances dictate a new phase in this protracted war?

As a leading source for cybersecurity, information governance, and legal discovery insights, including international investigations and litigation, ComplexDiscovery OÜ recognizes the importance of awareness regarding alleged and documented criminal acts, particularly in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. While we, following the lead of the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), do not provide detailed coverage of war crimes in our primary reports, we encourage professionals within the eDiscovery ecosystem to stay informed about these activities. This awareness is crucial for understanding potential future legal actions and responsibilities.

Detailed Reporting with Maps for February 28, 2025, from the ISW – Mouseover to Scroll

Russo-Ukrainian War February 28 2025

Review the Detailed Reporting and Maps PDF

About the Institute for the Study of War Research Methodology

ISW’s research methodology relies on both primary and secondary sources, enabling researchers to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situation on the ground. In order to analyze military and political developments in any given area, ISW’s research analysts must wholly understand the systems of enemy and friendly forces. They must also understand the population demographics, physical terrain, politics, and history of that area. This lays the analytical foundation for understanding the reasons for particular developments and fulfilling their assigned research objectives. ISW analysts also spend time in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere in order to gain a better understanding of the security and political situation and to evaluate the implementation of current strategies and policies. Our researchers compile data and analyze trends, producing a granular analysis of developments in areas of research, producing an accurate, high-resolution, timely, and thorough picture of the situation. ISW’s research methodology guarantees its success and commitment to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations, achieve strategic objectives, and respond to emerging problems that may require the use of American military power.

About the Institute for the Study of War

The Institute for the Study of War advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. They are committed to improving the nation’s ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve U.S. strategic objectives. ISW is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization.

Learn more, get involved, and contribute today.

Additional Reading

Assisted by GAI and LLM Technologies

* Sourced and shared with direct expressed permission from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

Source: ComplexDiscovery OÜ

The post The War’s Expanding Front: Russian Advances, Ukraine’s Counterattacks, and Global Alliances in Flux appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.